Kryptonim
R42 Snapshot
- R42 Risk Rating (Editorial): RED — High Risk
- Evidence Grade: Corroborated (multi-source reporting + registry references; no enforcement action confirmed in linked coverage)
- Last reviewed: 2026-01-05
- Next review due: 2026-02-05 (or sooner if new rail events emerge)
- R42 Reports: Kryptonim
Separation rule: The traffic-light rating is editorial and evidence-led. User stars/reviews are a community signal and do not automatically change the editorial rating.
Is this your company?
Claim and verify this profile to display your official information and build trust with customers.
Why this profile is flagged
FinTelegram has repeatedly reported Kryptonim being used in offshore casino deposit rails, including flows that can appear to users as “bank transfer / instant banking” but result in crypto purchases inside layered cashier structures. See the coverage hub below.
Evidence Pack
Identity & regulatory reality (as reported/available)
- Brand: Kryptonim
- Website: kryptonim.com
- Poland entity (reported): Kryptonim sp. z o.o. (Warsaw)
- Polish VASP register entry (reported): RDWW-649 (as referenced in published coverage)
- Cross-border footprint (reported): additional entities mentioned in provider disclosures (e.g., Canada / Colombia)
Note: A “VASP register entry” is not the same as EU-wide authorisation under MiCA, and it does not automatically explain how third-party merchants use the rail.
Rails & exposure (reported)
- Primary function: fiat-to-crypto on-ramp
- Reported high-risk use-case: casino funding flows via cashier / intermediary layers
- Merchant-of-Record clarity: often unclear / layered in reported iGaming cashier contexts
- Consumer protection angle: disputes/chargebacks may become harder once the value is converted to crypto
Rail Map Mini (reported pattern)
- User selects “bank transfer / instant banking” in an offshore casino cashier
- Flow routes through one or more intermediary/aggregation layers
- Kryptonim appears as the crypto on-ramp (purchase / conversion step)
- Casino balance is credited via digital-asset funding (reported)
Confidence: Corroborated (based on repeated published reporting and referenced artifacts).
Key Risk Tags
- Rail opacity (layered intermediaries)
- Reported iGaming exposure (offshore casino cashier integrations)
- MoR ambiguity in reported flows
- Cross-jurisdiction footprint
Evidence & coverage
- FinTelegram hub: Kryptonim (all related reports)
- Winning.io rail reporting (Kryptonim / Depasify / Rillpay)
- LuckyWins: layered payment facades (reported)
Change Log
- 2026-01-05 — Initial rating published: RED. Trigger: consolidation of repeated published reporting + referenced registry entry.
Community Signal (User Reviews)
If you have used Kryptonim (directly or inside a cashier flow), your factual experience helps others:
- What happened (deposit method, timeline, outcome)?
- Any support/ticket outcome?
- Screenshots welcome (please redact personal/banking data).
Corrections / Right-to-Reply
If you represent Kryptonim or have verifiable evidence of an error, submit a correction request (include the exact statement + supporting documentation).
- RatEx42 does not accept payment to change ratings.
- Valid evidence includes registry extracts, corporate filings, or official regulator correspondence.
Corrections link: (add your corrections form URL here)
Disclaimer: RatEx42 publishes evidence-led risk assessments, not legal conclusions. Ratings may change as new evidence emerges.
