Chainvalley
CyberFinance updates: For investigations, evidence updates, and rating changes related to this listing, read the magazine coverage on
RateEx42.com.
R42 Snapshot
- R42 Risk Rating (Editorial): ⚫ BLACK — Severe Risk
- Evidence Grade: Corroborated (published rail artifacts + official register entry)
- Last reviewed: 2026-01-06
- Next review due: 2026-02-06 (or sooner if new rail events emerge)
Separation rule: The traffic-light rating is editorial and evidence-led.
User stars/reviews are a community signal and do not automatically change the editorial rating.
Why this profile is flagged
FinTelegram reports Chainvalley as a key component in “fake-fiat / fake bank deposit” rails used by offshore casinos: what users experience as a normal “fiat deposit” is implemented as an embedded crypto purchase (e.g., USDC) followed by an automated transfer to casino wallets, reducing classic chargeback/dispute leverage and raising AML/consumer-protection concerns.
Evidence Pack
Identity & registry facts
- Brand: Chainvalley
- Observed domains (reported): chainvalley.pro and
app.chainvalley.pro - Legal entity (reported): CHAIN VALLEY sp. z o.o. (Warsaw)
- Poland VASP register entry: RDWW-765 (entry date shown: 25.05.2023)
- KRS / NIP (register): KRS 0001036419 • NIP 7252331409
Note: A Polish VASP register entry does not equal EU-wide authorisation under MiCA and does not, by itself, explain how third-party merchants use the rail.
Rail Map Mini (reported pattern)
- User selects a “bank transfer / fiat top-up” style option in an offshore casino cashier
- Flow routes through one or more intermediary labels (reported example: utPay)
- Checkout executes as a crypto purchase via Chainvalley (reported)
- Purchased stablecoins (e.g., USDC) are then sent to a casino wallet (reported)
- Reported funding rails: Skrill / Neteller inside the embedded “crypto buy” flow
- Consent / UX concern (reported): crypto-buy consent is shown as pre-ticked, and changing the destination wallet triggers warnings / appears effectively blocked
Key Risk Tags
- Fake-fiat / deposit obfuscation (reported)
- Rail opacity / layered intermediaries
- Merchant-of-Record unclear
- High-risk merchant exposure (iGaming)
- Consumer redress friction once value is converted to crypto
Evidence & coverage
- FinTelegram hub: Chain Valley / Chainvalley
- Legiano “Fake-Fiat” Deposits: Chainvalley/utPay funnels players into USDC transfers (reported)
- Poland: Virtual-currency activity register (PDF)
Change Log
- 2026-01-06 — Initial rating published: ⚫ BLACK.
Trigger: published “fake-fiat” rail artifacts + verified VASP register entry (RDWW-765).
Next review due: 2026-02-06.
Community Signal (User Reviews)
If you encountered Chainvalley in a casino deposit flow (or used it directly), your factual experience helps others:
- What did the cashier call the payment method (bank transfer / instant banking / etc.)?
- What actually happened at checkout (KYC, crypto buy, stablecoin transfer)?
- Outcome: credited / rejected / refunds / disputes?
- Screenshots welcome (please redact personal/banking data).
Corrections / Right-to-Reply
If you represent Chainvalley (or have primary documents showing an error), submit a correction request with the exact statement and supporting evidence.
RatEx42 does not accept payment to change ratings.
Disclaimer: RatEx42 publishes evidence-led risk assessments, not legal conclusions. Ratings may change as new evidence emerges.
